When the
14th Amendment was implemented back in 1868, there were a lot of questionable things that had transpired
... and still are over 150 years later.
Sadly, there are a plethora of proclaimed
"experts" who tend to discount what government
"Reconstruction" was all about. It centers around the happenings of the
Reconstruction Acts AND the
Reconstruction Amendments. They are two different sets of law. The former being specific legislation to deal with certain issues. The latter being more permanent legislation. Moreover, something that is found in the
Constitution is going to apply to
ALL the States in the Union
... not just some of them. Really. 14th Amendment language pertains to
"rebels" of the Civil War
? Seriously. These
so-called experts better not quit their day jobs. The elements of the amendment have absolutely nothing to do with addressing any matters of the past, except what may involve
Reconstruction subject matter.
Mixing the two concepts is an act of incompetence. Of course there is similar language used in the
Acts and
Amendment (and arguments, etc.). Actually, this is a deceptive component attached to the whole
emergency-conspiracy matter called
"Reconstruction" : an act or measure of the
Rump Congress that setup a calculated
dual system of constitutional law. But, that is a
secret not well known. Only
cabalists know about it; to include members of the
Luciferian Bunch, such as
Alan Dershowitz. Time will tell if he is a
conspirator or just
incompetent.
Additionally, one should realize that both Sections 3 and 4 of the amendment use the word
"shall" a bit. This word imports things that would happen in the future, not the past. If you look at the context of the language therein, it applies to all things future with little error being applied to past
Civil War matters. Again, the matter of intelligence, competency, and deception comes into question.
The duality issue is undoubtedly tied to what Karl Marx established under the Communist game plan. He told the world things were going to be backwards and immoral. Criminality of the
so-called "Civil War" period was not immune.