Really. Kings & States are considered to be sovereign, not individuals. |
The Latin breakdown of terms makes it simply clear : the former accepts personal jurisdiction, the latter infers being able to challenge it.Pro Se broken down in Latin basically means, To move forward or proceed as a litigant without the aid of an attorney or a lawyer as one's self...
- Pro. Latin meaning: in front of, before, for, forward.
- Se. Latin meaning: himself, one's self.
- In Propria. Latin meaning: in their own.
- Persona. Latin meaning: mask, character, personality.
The "Law of Persons" is discussed in a book titled The Institutes of Roman Law by Rudolph Sohm. The book goes over in detail what the law industry toys with to maintain the gray area caused by the 14th Amendment legal system.Pro Per can mean essentially the same and Pro Se. Latin construct is precise. Many don't understand the variance from the English... not even attorneys...
- What does Pro Per and Pro Se mean? Pro Per and Pro Se are used interchangeably. They are both short for “propria persona”, which is Latin for “for oneself”. The terms Pro Per and Pro Se usually apply to a person who represents themselves in a lawsuit.
~Affordable Family Law
- In personam, literally translating to “against the person”, refers to courts' power to adjudicate matters directed against a party. In personam jurisdiction is one of the two forms of personal jurisdiction with the other being in-rem jurisdiction. ~Cornell Law
The Marriage License provides government Equity Jurisdiction. |
There are a lot of people termed Sovereign Citizens that pull the "I don't consent" card. Well, that is going to be an automatic FAIL. A thing called the Social Contract pulls them into the system of federal-state statutory wizardry.That established, there are two types of consent:
- Explicit. Also sometimes referred to as express consent.
- Implicit. Also sometimes referred to as implied or inferred consent.
As you can see from these definitions, imply and infer are often used in the same context. And that’s why they can be confused— because they’re often used at opposite ends of the same situation. When someone implies something (suggests it without saying it explicitly), you have to infer their meaning (conclude what they mean based on the hints that have been given).
Seriously. Do you really know who you follow on the Internet? |
- FEDERAL COMMON LAW: A concept intriguing to legal scholars,
strictly speaking, a nonentity. —15 Am J2d Com L § 4
We can see his corpus is covered, but where's his mask? Seriously. |
- Cujus est commodum ejus debet esse incommodum.
He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage.
The fact is, most people – or rather persons – could not pass the Title 5 USC litmus test or would fail the Duck Rule test which encompasses the Ashwander Rules that were set forth by the Supreme Court during the 1930's.
- See more here on the PAC Alliance site... The Duck Rule
- Understand the Red Nightmare, read... The Dual System of Law
- Marxist Twaddle... https://pacinlaw.us/twaddle
- Join us in Godly Evolution... https://pacinlaw.us/ring
Please share. We ask all references to People's Awareness Coalition remain. Get On Board! Please join us on the PAC Open Forum...
- PAC Open Forum Registration... https://pacgroups.us/register